Skip to main content

Review: Aladdin (2019)

Aladdin (2019)

Ugh... I think the most succinct review I could give to this film is to put in one of those frowny-face emojis... Here is yet again one more uninspired live-action remake of a beloved Disney classic. This one had an uphill battle right from the get-go knowing it would have to compete with the late Robin William's tour de force performance as the Genie. However, truth be told, Will Smith's go at the role is not the worst part of this film. In fact, though Smith is no Williams, he does an adequate job at the role and tries his best to put his own spin on it (though it is difficult not to see Genie as simply being a blue-Will Smith).
Aladdin is a strange beast as it is a mixture of recreating the original film verbatim and then also adding in some new plot points for Jasmine and the Genie.  The depth of these two characters are noticeably upgraded while the title character's arc remains quite unremarkable and relatively uninteresting.  Jasmine contends with being a female in a male-dominated society relegated to her palace and without a voice in society and Genie deals with the struggle between wanting freedom and being subservient to his master, however, Aladdin's struggle is simply whether to lie or not in order to get the girl he fancies. This result is a bit wonky and awkward. The film has its moments though, some of the action scenes, songs and interactions do work well. I don't particularly think director, Guy Ritchie's, style was the best choice for this film - some of his time altering tricks are rather obtrusive here and do not have the cool effect such as in his early English thug films. Some of his humour does work though as between Aladdin and Genie.

The cast is also very much a mixed-bag. Mena Massoud who plays Aladdin is quite hit-or-miss. I found him quite stiff in the scenes with Jasmine while he fared better with the ones with Genie. Naomi Scott I thought was one of the stronger presences (possibly due to her more compelling story), as well, she has a strong new musical number. As stated, Will Smith is okay. He is given more space with a greater story though he is very much still 'Will Smith' acting here. Lastly, the other main key cast is Marwan Kenzari as Jafar. Honestly, I thought this was one of the weakest parts of the film. The filmmakers clearly tried to make Jafar less of an overt or exaggerated villain but the result, in my opinion, is simply a wholly uninteresting villain. I really did miss the manic evilness of the old animated Jafar while watching. I imagine a lot of people who have a special place in their hearts for the original Aladdin will probably see this at some point. As always, there is base entertainment value in seeing an animated film transition to live-action but, in this case, the enjoyment doesn't go far beyond that point. This new rendition of the classic is most definitely not 'a whole new world'.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Whiplash (2012)

Whiplash (2012) TLDR: On multiple levels Whiplash is a brilliant film. A dual character study. An ode to jazz music supremacy. And a cautionary (or inspiring?) tale of what it takes to become the world's greatest. In an instant, Whiplash cements Damien Chazelle as one of today's youngest and most talented filmmakers brimming with artistry, intensity and craftsmanship. This is not one to miss. It was surprising that the first time I saw Whiplash, I left the theatre with a slightly nauseous feeling in my gut. Not because of the film itself - its visuals or audio per se - there is nothing to criticize about its radiance. It was in its simple yet utterly-effective and haunting discussion of what it takes to become the greatest in one's field that left me feeling torn and conflicted. While most of the film seems to be a cautionary or reprimanding tale of jazz instructor Fletcher's (JK Simmons) brutal methods of 'mentorship', its ending posits perhaps an equally stron...

Review: The Before Trilogy (1995, 2004, 2013)

The Before Trilogy TLDR: As a whole, and in each of its separate parts, Richard Linklater's 'Before Trilogy' is the cinematic experience in its absolute finest form. The story of Celine and Jesse speaks to the core of the human experience - surprising joys, inevitable obstacles and eventual pains, and, most importantly, the mystery and intrigue of love - and it does it in an affecting way that, almost unlike any other film, is simultaneously theatrical and also remarkably raw and realistic.  "It's just, people have these romantic projections they put on everything. That's not based on any kind of reality." - Jesse, Before Sunrise Even more than the multitudes of other incredible introspective bits of wisdom and philosophy that Celine and Jesse converse in across the three movies, this quote perhaps sums up the trilogy best of all. What are romance movies other than certain individuals' projections of what romance - often, idealized romance - is. Most o...

Review: Pierrot le Fou (1965)

Pierrot le Fou (1965) TLDR: Despite being a 'classic' and perhaps one of the quintessential European New Wave films, Godard's Pierrot le Fou is the antithesis to today's contemporary mainstream movie-going experience. It is an entertainingly goofy affair yet also baffling and often indecipherable. It is both an homage and also a commentary on the medium of film, and one that requires a good deal of contemplative afterthought to ponder what exactly it is you've just watched... I will admit that Pierrot is the first film by the legendary Jean-Luc Godard that I have seen. While I knew his status as an auteur and as one of the best of his craft, I didn't quite know his 'style' going into this film. As anyone who has seen some of Godard's will know, within twenty minutes or so, I was taken for quite the turn - I quickly felt like I was part of Ferdinand and Marianne's chaotic joy ride through the European countryside filled with romance, crime, non-se...