Skip to main content

Review: Doctor Sleep (2019)

Doctor Sleep (2019)

Oddly enough, the latest of Stephen King's book adaptations is one of the toughest reviews I've had to write. I have a lot of conflicted thoughts and emotions about this film, and, largely, this is because it is a sequel to a very classic film - one of my favourites in fact - and, in my opinion, the best horror film of all time. Unlike many sequels, however, Doctor Sleep is a legitimate continuation of the story as it was penned by King himself in 2013 (whether he should have done so is an entirely separate discussion). Now, writer/director, Mike Flanagan, had a uniquely difficult task as he decided to make this film a sequel to both The Shining the book and the film - and for those King diehards, you know that there are significant differences between the two. Lastly, is the fact that The Shining was made by one of the all-time greats, Stanley Kubrick, and no matter how much you want to, or try to, you cannot help but compare Doctor Sleep to The Shining to each other because they take place in the same world (and have a number of artistic and plot overlaps). All in all, I did actually enjoy the film quite a lot, despite knowing that it would never come close to the height of The Shining.
In the best way I can say it, watching Doctor Sleep is like seeing someone who grew up with The Shining make a contemporary fan-fiction story continuing the story of Danny Torrance. Directorially, the film very much looks like a modern film - it is glossy and made with the common combination of modern-style framing and fast cutting. This juxtaposes with The Shining's classic wide-shots, slight graininess and long sequences and scenes. In this way, Doctor Sleep very much feels like a contemporary horror film as opposed to The Shining's classic-feeling slow-burn. Again, one cannot really fault Flanagan for this. Though he tries to emulate Kubrick in certain scenes it would likely have been a detriment to the film if he had tried to make the entire film in Kubrick's style.

Now, for more SPOILERY discussion...

As mentioned, there are a few significant differences between The Shining book and movie that directly affect an adaptation of Doctor Sleep. Foremost is that in the book the hotel is ultimately destroyed when Jack forgets to reset the boiler during his downward spiral. On the other hand, in the film the hotel remains intact. In the final act of Doctor Sleep the book, Danny and Abra have a showdown in the campgrounds that have been made on the old grounds of the hotel. In the film, however, as the hotel is still standing, this showdown takes place in the hotel itself. As such, Flanagan, in his film, takes the opportunity to directly revisit Kubrick's film, bringing back characters, locations and imagery straight out of the classic. It is here that many fans will decide whether they love or hate this film. Returning to this beloved world is a risky task and unless done perfectly it could easily leave a sour taste. In most regards, I think it was done in fine fashion. However, that Danny is able to 'fight off' the hotel for moments in order to let Abra escape seemed like a cheap plot convenience and not true to the original story. Flanagan also recasts all of the stars of the original film for certain scenes in Doctor Sleep. While I surprisingly thought they all worked okay, I did find the actor who played Jack quite distracting. Unlike the others who are able to emulate the original actors' voices well, Henry Thomas, who plays Jack, does not sound anything like Jack Nicholson nor does he carry the same gravitas as the legendary Nicholson.

I realize that I haven't discussed many of the core facets of this film. All of the stars are quite strong throughout, especially the always-great Ewan McGregor as the tortured Danny, as well as Rebecca Ferguson and newcomer Kyliegh Curran. Doctor Sleep is the kind of film I could talk about for a long, long time. Ultimately, I think it does succeed more than it stumbles. But one cannot really fault the film for not being completely perfect due to the ridiculously large shoes it has to step into. If you are a fan of Stephen King, The Shining and horror films (and are able to go into the film without prejudice) then there is quite a lot to enjoy here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Sound of Metal (2020)

Sound of Metal (2020) TLDR: Easily one of the best films I have seen in a long while. Grounded by an absolutely stellar performance by Riz Ahmed (and co-star, Olivia Cooke), Darius Marder's Sound of Metal is a moving and deeply-empathetic look into the journey and struggle to find peace with one's self through the lens of a musician who loses his hearing.  Have no doubt, if you are not yet familiar with the names Riz Ahmed and Olivia Cooke you are about to be. Both actors - Ahmed in particular who leads the film - are transcendent in Darius Marder's Sound of Metal. Ahmed plays Ruben, a heavy metal drummer, in a duo group led by guitar/singer, Lou, played by Cooke. The two are as much a pair off-stage as they are on it. It is clear from early on that they are all that the other really has in life and they are content to travel across the country in their RV together playing shows and making ends meet as best they can. However, all goes awry when Ruben - who batters his eardr

Review: Soul (2020)

Soul (2020) TLDR: For a year where many may feel like they have lost a little piece of their own, Soul has arrived to remind us all what's most important in life. This is a Pixar film that is arguably more important for adults to watch than kids: it is beautiful - in both story and art, it is quirky, it is heartfelt and, as these trying times endlessly push on, it reminds us that there is still a lot of good in this world to enjoy and reflect upon.  Note: some spoilers below. It takes a little bit of time to ease into Disney/Pixar's Soul. Though the film starts out in a lush and beautifully rendered NYC filled with delightful jazz music as we follow Joe around his everyday boroughs, things very quickly run astray. Suddenly, we are thrown into an abstract world filled with Picasso-like wiry characters and massively heady existential concepts like 'where do we come from', 'the great beyond', and much more. If it's not immediately apparent, it soon becomes clea

Review: Pierrot le Fou (1965)

Pierrot le Fou (1965) TLDR: Despite being a 'classic' and perhaps one of the quintessential European New Wave films, Godard's Pierrot le Fou is the antithesis to today's contemporary mainstream movie-going experience. It is an entertainingly goofy affair yet also baffling and often indecipherable. It is both an homage and also a commentary on the medium of film, and one that requires a good deal of contemplative afterthought to ponder what exactly it is you've just watched... I will admit that Pierrot is the first film by the legendary Jean-Luc Godard that I have seen. While I knew his status as an auteur and as one of the best of his craft, I didn't quite know his 'style' going into this film. As anyone who has seen some of Godard's will know, within twenty minutes or so, I was taken for quite the turn - I quickly felt like I was part of Ferdinand and Marianne's chaotic joy ride through the European countryside filled with romance, crime, non-se