Skip to main content

Review: Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga (2020)

Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga (2020)

On paper, the Eurovision Song Contest is a perfect vehicle for a classic Will Ferrell comedy romp. The long-running and immensely popular real-life contest has that same oddball and quirky charm that Ferrell exudes in all of his successful films. Having him star as an Icelandic wannabe-pop star that allows for him to sing has a lot of inherent potential (for a retrospective, see his rendition of Por Ti Volare in Step Brothers). However, the film ultimately lacks the pieces that have led to Ferrell's beloved classics. Despite its promising premise, Eurovision is devoid of consistent laughs, its plot ambles and runs too long, and many of its cast seem a tad too out-of-place to sell the vision of this contest.

Lars (Ferrell) and Sigrit (Rachel McAdams) are a singing duo/best friends/possible siblings who have their sights set on the Eurovision contest, and, after a string of lucky mishaps the two get their shining opportunity to compete in it. At the contest are a variety of other contestants including Russia's Alexander Lemtov (Dan Stevens). Stevens is undoubtedly the best part of Eurovision - he taps into the eccentricity of the contest as well as the film's overall comedy more than anyone else in the film. Ferrell is very much his usual; his customary antics and the base visual of seeing him with a long flowing wig singing and speaking with a shoddy Icelandic accent bring in laughs for a short while. After that, he sinks into his norm - one that never hits its highs of yesteryear. McAdams carries a lot of the heart of the film and, while she has a few laughs here and there, it is clear that this kind of zany comedy is not her forte nor within her comfort zone. Similarly, Pierce Brosnan - Lars' father - and the few other cameos sprinkled throughout - are never remarkable or very funny.
Eurovision at its core is a Will Ferrell paint-by-numbers comedy. It has all of the pieces of some of his former hits, however, it lacks the inherent comedy, charm and quotable/memorable moments that would make it a classic. The film has that sliver of entertainment that will drag you through to its end, but it is there, at its predictable ending, when the dreary thought will settle in 'why did I just waste two hours on that'.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Whiplash (2012)

Whiplash (2012) TLDR: On multiple levels Whiplash is a brilliant film. A dual character study. An ode to jazz music supremacy. And a cautionary (or inspiring?) tale of what it takes to become the world's greatest. In an instant, Whiplash cements Damien Chazelle as one of today's youngest and most talented filmmakers brimming with artistry, intensity and craftsmanship. This is not one to miss. It was surprising that the first time I saw Whiplash, I left the theatre with a slightly nauseous feeling in my gut. Not because of the film itself - its visuals or audio per se - there is nothing to criticize about its radiance. It was in its simple yet utterly-effective and haunting discussion of what it takes to become the greatest in one's field that left me feeling torn and conflicted. While most of the film seems to be a cautionary or reprimanding tale of jazz instructor Fletcher's (JK Simmons) brutal methods of 'mentorship', its ending posits perhaps an equally stron...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: The Before Trilogy (1995, 2004, 2013)

The Before Trilogy TLDR: As a whole, and in each of its separate parts, Richard Linklater's 'Before Trilogy' is the cinematic experience in its absolute finest form. The story of Celine and Jesse speaks to the core of the human experience - surprising joys, inevitable obstacles and eventual pains, and, most importantly, the mystery and intrigue of love - and it does it in an affecting way that, almost unlike any other film, is simultaneously theatrical and also remarkably raw and realistic.  "It's just, people have these romantic projections they put on everything. That's not based on any kind of reality." - Jesse, Before Sunrise Even more than the multitudes of other incredible introspective bits of wisdom and philosophy that Celine and Jesse converse in across the three movies, this quote perhaps sums up the trilogy best of all. What are romance movies other than certain individuals' projections of what romance - often, idealized romance - is. Most o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: Pierrot le Fou (1965)

Pierrot le Fou (1965) TLDR: Despite being a 'classic' and perhaps one of the quintessential European New Wave films, Godard's Pierrot le Fou is the antithesis to today's contemporary mainstream movie-going experience. It is an entertainingly goofy affair yet also baffling and often indecipherable. It is both an homage and also a commentary on the medium of film, and one that requires a good deal of contemplative afterthought to ponder what exactly it is you've just watched... I will admit that Pierrot is the first film by the legendary Jean-Luc Godard that I have seen. While I knew his status as an auteur and as one of the best of his craft, I didn't quite know his 'style' going into this film. As anyone who has seen some of Godard's will know, within twenty minutes or so, I was taken for quite the turn - I quickly felt like I was part of Ferdinand and Marianne's chaotic joy ride through the European countryside filled with romance, crime, non-se...
Post a Comment
Read more